I learned so much from this film. I wish, that there were more like this.There's a certain type of media that I loathe with passion. It is when what is supposed to be a debate is treated as an echochamber instead, with only one-sided opinions being bounced around. I'm here to offer the other side of the debate, to point at the bias in this production.Peer-reviewed studies show that women have an ingroup preference 4.5x stronger than that of men. I encourage you to look it up, I'm not so sure whether I'm actually allowed to link anything here.That means, that preference of the own sex among men would be a 2.5, and for women it would be a 10. That's of course an absolutely massive difference, yet we're told sexism is a one way street, men to women -- so let's ask the question: Where does this difference manifest? Well, good, that you're asking, we have an example right here, after all. This very video for instance quotes: "There is an element of hatred and rejection in men's relationships to women" Now, this might strike you as a paradox considering the study that tells us that it is overwhelmingly women that prefer another over the other gender, not men. If on average a member of a race would prefer their own race 4.5 times over another race, would we really have any problems recognizing this behavior? Obviously not. Well, the answer is because 51% of the population is only pointing in one direction, while the other 49% are often pointing at each other, that we've arrived at this unequal situation where we can't see the forrest for the trees. To illustrate this further, let's investigate injustices that are completely ignored even in broad daylight: If all groups could vote, but only one group, let's say, blacks, would be forced to go to war by the state, wouldn't we immediately lament this injustice? Couldn't it even happen that based on bias/prejudice alone, the other groups could vote for war? It doesn't matter whether it actually happens or not, what matters is that on principle, it is horrifyingly wrong. So now, that Ive highlighted one of the many blindspots in modern society, please ask yourself the following question: What is more likely: That men, despite having a significantly lower ingroup preference, simply despise and hate women, and want to keep them down (but still tolerate blatant, principally wrong injustices), or that the entire debate is crooked from the start because the largest group is, almost exclusively, pointing at the smaller group that doesn't have the same collectivism, causing any dissenting voices to be drowned out? And what then when you add the higher market value of female sexuality and innate protective instincts towards women among men into the mix? And then consider, that according to numerous studies gathered by BusinessInsider, 80-90% of household spending, even broken down into categories such as car, house, vacation, luxury goods, is done by women, despite men making more money? Or that, when the gender of the test taker wasn't revealed, men were rated significantly better than with their gender revealed? I rest my case on this, and this echochamber of a video certainly isn't changing anything.Of course women enjoy sex more than men. If men historically enjoyed it too much, they'd be too vulnerable towards being attacked. The same goes for the duration, of course. Historically, it was more masculine to get it done quickly, sober up immediately afterwards and be alert.But let's summarize; this is an excellent case study of the "women are wonderful" effect, it creates an oppression narrative, paints female sexuality as magical -- all with uplifting, whimsical music -- and male sexuality as banal, throughout the entire thing you won't find a single moment of introspection. I have no idea how much contempt I'd have to have to produce something nearly as propagandistic as this. Thankfully, I know many women that have the same gutteral reaction against something like this that I do.PS: If you disagree with anything in my review, please tell me in the comments, I can always adjust it, but I would really prefer to hear your criticism directly.My wife and I watched it. It was very interesting. Like all narratives, it will provide a certain "perspective." The historical analysis of women's sex drive by Annine van der Meer was particularly interesting, as it described a natural focus on women's desire for sex as part of early human life. I would imagine without a film like this, most Americans would never hear from Dutch historian Dr. Annine van der Meer of the PanSophia Academy (who also sells books on Amazon as "Annine E. G. van der Meer"), who has also written on the Eternal Supreme Sacred Feminine. There is also commentary from psychologist Katarina Gaborova, Sandra Moti (biochemist), Nicole Caldwell (former chief and editor of Playgirl), and Dian Biemans (economist).It assesses both sides of the argument, but it emphasizes certain information more highly. Don't we all in life? But that is the point in life, to hear opinions other than only mainstream arguments. I think part of the argument was that women's sex drive can have a different way of manifestations, as a result of changes in society over thousands of years, but that women have a naturally stronger sex drive than men.There are segments of film nudity in this documentary, which is a natural part of showing the human body, and a key point of the documentary. The idea that women (and men) should be ashamed of their body is inherently anti-historical, based on the documentary.As power shifts between the sexes and individuals over centuries, especially after the recovery from the ice age, the role of human from migrating from a regional and more agrarian role to seeking to "conquer" the lands of others is discussed. In Dr. Annine van der Meer's perspective, this led to some of the more unbalanced aggression that has come to become a "normal" portrayal of male sexuality, and unbalanced repression of women's open sexuality. Certainly the story is more complicated, and you need to watch the documentary to get the entire point, but this was important analysis, which shouldn't be readily labeled with condemning the sexuality of anyone. I would highly recommend the movie for its insightful commentary. Whether you agree or disagree, we can all find progress with an open mind.